Skip to content
Go back

Economics & Econometrics in QS Subject Rankings 2026: Global Distribution and Top-Tier Indicators

Updated:

The 2026 QS World University Rankings by Subject places 699 institutions worldwide in Economics & Econometrics, spanning 75 countries and regions. Harvard University holds the top position. This is not a small, elite club—it is a discipline with genuine global breadth, yet the distribution of ranked institutions is heavily concentrated at the top of the list, and the geographic spread is far from even.

How Many Institutions Are Ranked, and Where Are They?

The 699 ranked programs across 75 countries represent a substantial field. But the country-level breakdown reveals a clear hierarchy of participation. The United States leads with 110 ranked institutions, more than the next two countries combined. The United Kingdom follows with 59, and China (Mainland) ranks third with 52. Germany (32), France (27), and India (27) sit close together, followed by Italy (23), Australia (22), Spain (20), and Canada (18) to complete the top ten.

These numbers describe how many institutions each country fields in the ranking—not how well they perform. A country with many ranked programs may have a long tail of lower-ranked entries, while another with fewer entries could be more competitive at the top. The distinction matters for readers comparing national systems.

Country/RegionRanked Institutions
United States of America110
United Kingdom59
China (Mainland)52
Germany32
France27
India27
Italy23
Australia22
Spain20
Canada18

What Does the Rank Distribution Look Like?

The shape of the ranking is steep at the top and broad at the bottom. Only 10 institutions make the top 10, and the top 20 adds another 10. The top 30 holds 30 programs total, and the top 50 reaches 50. But the jump to the top 100 is larger: 101 institutions are ranked within the top 100, meaning 51 programs sit between ranks 51 and 100.

Beyond that, the numbers expand considerably. The top 150 includes 150 programs, the top 200 includes 202, and the top 300 reaches 299. Another 400 institutions fall outside the top 300; QS publishes only rank ranges for institutions beyond the top 200, so their exact positions are not broken down into single-rank bands. A median rank cannot be computed for the 699 listed programs: the institution at the median position has only a published rank range (351-400), so its exact rank is not available.

In other words, being ranked is an achievement, but the competitive intensity at the very top is far greater than in the middle or lower reaches of the list.

How Do Scores Cluster?

The score bands tell a similar story. Only 10 institutions achieve an overall score of 90 or above. The 80–89 band contains 20 more, bringing the total with scores of 80 or higher to 30. The 70–79 band is the largest single cluster, with 99 institutions. The 60–69 band holds 73.

Among the 202 institutions with a published overall score, 73 fall in the 60–69 band and 129 score 70 or higher. The other 497 ranked institutions are listed with a rank or rank band but no overall score, and a missing score does not mean they scored below any threshold or were dropped from the ranking. This means the ranking’s lower half is compressed into a narrow score range, while the upper half spreads out across a much wider span. A single point of difference at the top can separate institutions by many rank positions, while at the bottom, dozens of programs may share nearly identical scores.

Subject RankInstitutionCountry/RegionAcademic ReputationEmployer ReputationCitationsOverall Score
1Harvard UniversityUnited States of America10010095.699.1
2Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)United States of America98.795.699.897.8
3Stanford UniversityUnited States of America96.295.897.496.6
4University of ChicagoUnited States of America95.879.410094
5Princeton UniversityUnited States of America97.882.396.893.8
6The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)United Kingdom9785.590.493.1
7University of California, Berkeley (UCB)United States of America93.986.69493
8University of OxfordUnited Kingdom93.59786.392.3
9Yale UniversityUnited States of America92.190.29592.1
10University of CambridgeUnited Kingdom91.796.485.390.4
11Columbia UniversityUnited States of America88.685.19289.5
12New York University (NYU)United States of America86.381.88986.9
12University of PennsylvaniaUnited States of America85.983.190.486.9
14University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)United States of America84.982.991.386.6
14National University of Singapore (NUS)Singapore88.187.683.986.6
16Northwestern UniversityUnited States of America86.672.693.786.2
17UCLUnited Kingdom86.880.886.485.9
18Bocconi UniversityItaly86.378.888.785.8
19Peking UniversityChina (Mainland)82.284.584.184.2
20Tsinghua UniversityChina (Mainland)8084.786.783.9

What Separates the Top Tier?

The top 10 programs are separated from the rest by a wide scoring gap. Ten institutions score 90 or above, while the next tier—the 20 programs in the 80–89 band—sits at least several points behind. The distribution suggests that the very top of Economics & Econometrics is a tightly contested group where small differences in academic reputation, employer reputation, and citation impact determine order.

For prospective students, this means the choice among top-tier programs is often about fit rather than quality. The score differences between ranks within the top 10 are narrow, and the factors that separate them—research output, faculty reputation, graduate outcomes—are not easily captured by a single number.

The broader lesson from the 2026 ranking is that Economics & Econometrics is a field with a strong global presence but a highly stratified structure. The United States and the United Kingdom dominate the upper echelons, while other countries participate in large numbers but with fewer programs at the very top. For readers choosing a program by subject, the ranking offers a useful map of where the field’s centers of gravity lie—but the finer distinctions require looking beyond the headline numbers.

Data Notes

This article is based on the QS World University Rankings by Subject 2026, published by Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), with a data reference date of April 3, 2026. The rankings cover 60 subject-specific tables and include component scores for academic reputation, employer reputation, citations, H-index, and international research network. The official source is available at QS World University Rankings by Subject 2026

The figures presented here reflect the Economics & Econometrics subject table, parsed by subject and filtered by country. Rank values are taken as the lower bound integer. The ranking includes 699 institutions globally across 75 countries and regions. Country-level counts reflect the number of ranked institutions per country, not the number of programs or departments. The top 100 boundary includes 101 institutions due to tied ranks. Score bands are based on overall scores as published; no arithmetic has been performed on the underlying data. Rankings measure relative performance against the indicators used by QS and do not constitute an assessment of teaching quality, program fit, or career outcomes for individual students.


Share this entry: Link copied

Related entries


Previous
Business & Management Studies in QS Subject Rankings 2026: Global Distribution and Top-Tier Indicators
Next
Accounting & Finance in QS Subject Rankings 2026: Global Distribution and Top-Tier Indicators